Ever wonder why the Supreme Court took the Citizens United case? Ever do some digging on the internet about how that group managed to hook the court into hearing this?
Here is what I understand. There is this attorney who has polished up a scheme to tailor cases to get selected for top court decisions.
It amounts to filing minor similar cases in as many lower courts as possible - thereby assuring that there will be conflicting decisions, and this latter is one of the conditions by which cases are selected for the Supreme Court. That's it. Of course there are some curious case connections among those on this subject of money equating speech and political figures. But I am not going to hand all this to you, go dig.
You have been emasculated, courtesy of Atty Jim Bopp!
graysmoke
No comments:
Post a Comment